If Bristol were black, well, if the Palin's were black, this would be their ruin. Black Bristol would be an example of the Black family's inability to measure up to white standards of morality, AKA "Small Town Values," and Palin would certainly be asked to step down from her nomintation. Bristol would disgust white Americans. She would remind them of the loose sexual morales that Black women naturally espouse, morales that were epitomized in the clever right wing nomenclature for Michelle Obama: "Barack's Baby Mama."
If Bristol were Black and not a Palin, if Bristol were just a pregnant Black seventeen year old, staying in school might not be an option. Whereas white Bristol is fortunate enough to have the moral support of her family, Black Bristol might not have the same support. And whatever the case of familial support may be, a Black Bristol would not have comparable fiscal or healthcare support to the Palin family. Black Bristol's child would be yet another notch in the Millenial "Black" Plague: Knocked Up and/or Locked Up.

The differences between Bristol Palin and a hypothetical Black Bristol are indeed myriad. But in general, whereas millions of Black Bristol's around the world have been nearly criminalized for their inability, amongst structural challenges to their child's welfare, to raise their children with the same values and privilages and their white counterparts, Bristol Palin has become an example of and not an exception to the strength of republican family values. Sarah Palin's decision to allow her daughter's child's father to be betrothed to her seventeen year old daughter and general acceptance of the young man, Levi Johnston, is not only considered appropriate (as opposed to an awkward arranged marriage), but an example of Palin's benevolence.
What's more, is that liberals are trying desperately to avoid this awkward subject, just as Republicans most likely prefer. No, there will be no swiftboating of Bristol Palin. There will be no judgement cast upon Sarah Palin's mothering skills, much unlike the judgement so hastily applied to young black women in the same situation. No, we will not even talk about it. And the person who does, is the anti-christ, another relentles fanatical liberal who will do anything to take back Washington including anhialate the santicty of personal privacy of a seventeen year old.
But what is so hypocritical about this way to handle such an unfortunate situation is that a.) given a reverse party situation, Republicans would capitalize on the moment to point out lacking morality amongst liberals and b.) politics is personal. Always has been, and always will be. Personal Characteristics of a candidate far outweigh the influence of his knowledge of the issues.
But what really gets me going, most of all, is the fact that this sort of event has not brought up the subject of empathy. Whereas Palin is able to accept this sort of child into her household, emotionally, socially and economically, these criteria do not apply when a pregnant and impoverished black mother is in the same predicament. And Palin with her comfort of being able to finance a sixth child, wants to make it impossible for women who cannot even afford one child to reverse their mistake and abort the pregnancy. This lack of empathy is unacceptable.
Empathy is the number one lacking feature in govenment and yet the ideological crux of our ability to have a representative government.
This sort of moment should make Palin revisit her policy on abortion. For those seventeen year olds who are not as fortunate as her, but I suppose she hasn't walked a mile in Black Bristol's or her mother's shoes: Palin just doesn't get it!
